英语听力论坛's Archiver

yoyo530521 发表于 2008-11-22 14:03

天天商务英语学习

[table=98%][tr][td=1,1,357][align=left][color=#000033]天天商务英语词汇[/color][/align][/td][td=1,1,57][align=center][url=http://www.youmars.com/kj/mm20081031/mttx08/20081121_taxpayer(noun).mp3][color=#0000ff]语音下载[/color][/url][/align][/td][td=1,1,175][align=center][font=Bookman Old Style][color=#0000ff][/color] [/font][/align][/td][/tr][/table][table=98%][tr=#ffffff][td=2,1][align=center][font=Bookman Old Style][size=2][color=#990000]taxpayer (noun) [/color][/size][/font]纳税人[/align][/td][/tr][tr][td=1,1,94][align=center]解释[/align][/td][td=1,1,550][align=center][font=Bookman Old Style][size=2]a person who pays tax, particularly income tax[/size][/font][/align][/td][/tr][/table][table=98%][tr][td=1,1,95][align=center]例句[/align][/td][td=1,1,549][align=center][font=Bookman Old Style][size=2]Companies should not expect taxpayers to save them from bankruptcy.[/size][/font][/align][/td][/tr][/table][table=98%,incnew][tr][td=1,1,30] [/td][td=1,1,611][table=98%][tr][td=1,1,355][align=left][color=#000033]天天商务英语报道[/color][/align][/td][td=1,1,62][align=center][url=http://www.youmars.com/kj/mm20081031/mttx08/20081121_Companieswantpensionruleschanged.mp3][color=#0000ff]语音下载 [/color][/url][/align][/td][td=1,1,175][align=center][font=Bookman Old Style][color=#0000ff][/color] [/font][/align][/td][/tr][/table][/td][/tr][/table][table=98%][tr][td][align=center][font=Bookman Old Style][size=3][color=#990000]Companies want pension rules changed[/color][/size][/font][font=Bookman Old Style]
公司想要改变养老金政策[/font][/align][table=359][tr][td][font=Bookman Old Style][size=2]Some of the nation's largest companies are asking Congress to suspend rules requiring them to contribute more money to pension funds. Washington John Dimsdale reports.[/size][/font]
[font=Bookman Old Style]美国一些大公司要求国会暂停要求他们交纳更多养老金的规定。华盛顿的John Dimsdale做了报导。[/font]
[/td][/tr][/table][/td][td][table=176][tr][td][img]http://www.youmars.com/kj/mm20081031/mttpic/20081121_Companieswantpensionruleschanged.gif[/img][/td][/tr][/table][/td][/tr][/table][font=Bookman Old Style][size=2][b]Tess Vigeland:[/b] Last night, a bipartisan group of senators announced agreement on a bill that would temporarily change pension rules for U.S. companies. Right now, they have to make sure they have money on hand for a certain percentage of their pension obligations. But corporations are hoping to make some of that requirement go away. John Dimsdale reports from Washington.[/size][/font]
[font=Bookman Old Style][size=2][b]John Dimsdale: [/b]Two years ago, Congress cracked down on under-funded pensions with a law requiring companies to speed up payments and eliminate shortfalls by 2015.[/size][/font]
[font=Bookman Old Style][size=2]Under that law, company contributions into defined benefit pension accounts would have to increase $90 billion this year.[/size][/font]
[font=Bookman Old Style][size=2]Now, a group of companies is backing a Senate bill to give them at least a year's respite from that requirement. The companies argue that in the midst of a recession, diverting scarce profits into pension plans means less money for investments and job creation. But actuary Jeremy Gold rejects the idea that pension contributions mean fewer jobs since pension money is invested. [/size][/font]
[font=Bookman Old Style][size=2][b]Jeremy Gold:[/b] Contributions go into the pension plan, end up becoming new capital, and new liquidity for other companies and those very same dollars are used to hire people throughout our economy.[/size][/font]
[font=Bookman Old Style][size=2]Besides, Gold says, allowing companies to shirk their pension obligations puts the government's already-threatened pension insurance fund at greater risk.[/size][/font]

页: [1]

Powered by Discuz! Archiver 7.2  © 2001-2009 Comsenz Inc.