About Economic Globalization（1）
[align=center][align=center][b][font=Verdana][size=24pt]About[/size][/font][/b][b][/b][b][font=Verdana][size=24pt]Economic[/size][/font][/b][b][font=Verdana][size=24pt] Globalization[/size][/font][/b][/align][/align][align=center][align=center][b][font=Verdana][size=15pt]By Edward S. Herman[/size][/font][/b][b][font=Verdana][size=15pt][/size][/font][/b][/align][/align][align=center][align=center][b][i][font=Verdana][size=12pt]New Politics[/size][/font][/i][/b][b][i][font=Verdana][size=12pt][/size][/font][/i][/b][/align][/align][align=center][align=center][b][i][font=Verdana][size=12pt]vol. 7, no. 2 (new series), whole no. 26[/size][/font][/i][/b][b]
[/b][b][font=Verdana][size=12pt][/size][/font][/b][/align][/align][align=center][align=center][b][font=Verdana][size=12pt]Winter [/size][/font][/b][b][font=Verdana][size=12pt]2007[/size][/font][/b][b][font=Verdana][size=12pt] [b][/b][/size][/font][/b][/align][/align][align=left][align=left][font=Verdana][size=12pt][b]Globalization is both an active process of corporate expansion across borders and a structure of cross-border facilities and economic linkages that has been steadily growing and changing as the process gathers steam. Like its conceptual partner "free trade," globalization is also an ideology, whose function is to reduce any resistance to the process by making it seem both highly beneficent and unstoppable. [/b][/size][/font][font=Verdana][size=12pt][b][/b][/size][/font][/align][/align][align=left][align=left][font=Verdana][size=12pt][b]And as with free trade, while globalization may sometimes yield economic benefits, both the process and economic-political regime it is helping bring about threaten progressive ends, and should be recognized as such and fought at every level. Admittedly this is a formidable task, as the economic and political power of its beneficiaries, and its momentum, are great and contesting it seems an almost utopian undertaking. But globalization has its vulnerabilities, and attacking it intellectually, at the local level of plant abandonments and moves, as well as at the national political level can help build understanding and support for a larger oppositional movement. [/b][/size][/font][font=Verdana][size=12pt][b][/b][/size][/font][/align][/align][align=left][align=left][b][font=Verdana][size=12pt]Globalization as Ideology[/size][/font][/b][b][font=Verdana][size=12pt][/size][/font][/b][/align][/align][align=left][align=left][font=Verdana][size=12pt][b]Globalization is just one of an array of concepts and arguing points that have been mobilized to advance the corporate agenda. Others have been deregulation and getting government off our backs, balancing the budget, cutting back entitlements (non-corporate), and free trade. [/b][/size][/font][font=Verdana][size=12pt][b][/b][/size][/font][/align][/align][align=left][align=left][font=Verdana][size=12pt][b]Like free trade, globalization has an aura of virtue. Just as "freedom" must be good, so globalization hints at internationalism and solidarity between countries, as opposed to nationalism and protectionism, which have negative connotations. The possibility that cross-border trade and investment might be economically damaging to the weaker party, or that they might erode democratic controls in both the stronger and weaker countries, is excluded from consideration by mainstream economists and pundits.[color=#000000] [/color]It is also unthinkable in the mainstream that the contest between free trade and globalization, on the one hand, and "protectionism," on the other, might be reworded as a struggle between "protection"--of transnational corporate (TNC) rights--versus the "freedom" of democratic governments to regulate in the interests of domestic non-corporate constituencies. [/b][/size][/font][font=Verdana][size=12pt][b][/b][/size][/font][/align][/align][align=left][align=left][font=Verdana][size=12pt][b]As an ideology, globalization connotes not only freedom and internationalism, but, as it helps realize the benefits of free trade, and thus comparative advantage and the division of labor, it also supposedly enhances efficiency and productivity. Because of these virtues, and the alleged inability of governments to halt "progress," globalization is widely perceived as beyond human control, which further weakens resistance. [/b][/size][/font][font=Verdana][size=12pt][b][/b][/size][/font][/align][/align][align=left][align=left][b][font=Verdana][size=12pt] [/size][/font][/b][b][font=Verdana][size=12pt]Globalization as an Attack on Democracy [/size][/font][/b][b][font=Verdana][size=12pt][/size][/font][/b][/align][/align][align=left][align=left][font=Verdana][size=12pt][b]The globalization of recent decades was never a democratic choice by the peoples of the world--the process has been business driven, by business strategies and tactics, for business ends. Governments have helped, by incremental policy actions, and by larger actions that were often taken in secret, without national debate and discussion of where the entire process was taking the community. In the case of some major actions advancing the globalization process, like passing the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) or joining the European Monetary Union (EMU), publics have been subjected to massive propaganda campaigns by the interested business-media elites. In the United States, public opinion polls showed the general public against NAFTA even after incessant propaganda, but the mass media supported it, and it was passed. In Europe as well, polls have shown persistent majorities opposed to the introduction of the Euro, but a powerful elite supports it, so that it moves forward. [/b][/size][/font][font=Verdana][size=12pt][b][/b][/size][/font][/align][/align][align=left][align=left][font=Verdana][size=12pt][b]This undemocratic process, carried out within a democratic facade, is consistent with the distribution of benefits and costs of globalization, and the fact that globalization has been a tool serving elite interests. Globalization has also steadily weakened democracy, partly as a result of unplanned effects, but also because the containment of labor costs and scaling down of the welfare state has required the business minority to establish firm control of the state and remove its capacity to respond to the demands of the majority. The mix of deliberate and unplanned elements in globalization's antidemocratic thrust can be seen in each aspect of the attack process. [/b][/size][/font][font=Verdana][size=12pt][b][/b][/size][/font][/align][/align][align=left][align=left]
[font=Verdana][size=12pt][b][/b][/size][/font] [/align][/align]
页:
[1]