2011年考研英语复习三步走 复习, 三步走, 考研, 英语

lovecats

　　在经历了词汇和语法的双重洗礼后，我们才能算是有资格喊出这样一句话：考研，我来了！那么，我们在征服了词汇和语法两座大山之后，该干什么呢？做题！此处的“题”不仅仅是指历年来的真题，同样也包括各种渠道、各种来源的专项练习题和模拟题。　　1. 做题的好处？　　这个不用说，大家也能明白：就是为了巩固、加强、拓展我们已有的知识储备。专项练习题，让我们能够对各种题型集中火力，各个击破；模拟题，绝对全方位模拟实战，从知识层面到精神层面让我们对考研有更深刻的体会；真题，是我们复习的方向标，有助于我们把握考研的动态走向趋势。　　2. 什么时候用这些题？如何最大限度地利用这些题？　　专项练习题，就是你在做专项复习时用的，基本上是贯穿复习的基础阶段和强化阶段，一直持续到考前的2、3个月。　　专项练习题，一般只需要三种类型的：语法练习、阅读练习和作文练习。　　1) 语法练习一定要趁热打铁：　　① 每复习完一个语法点，一定要及时加以运用，做二十道练习题。这三十道题可以分为三组，每组十道。先做第一组题，做完之后核对答案，标注自己选错的题，并分析原因；然后做第二组题。　　② 每个周末对本周的语法点进行温习，然后拿出做错的题再做一遍。　　③ 每个月底同样要对本月的语法点和做错的题进行回顾。　　2) 阅读练习可以在拥有一定词汇量和语法知识后再开始进行。　　① 阅读前期。阅读的初期要精读，并且不要过多地注重做题。每一篇阅读至少要读3遍：第一遍通读，了解全文大意，并标注生词(读完第一遍之后要查阅)和长难句；第二遍精读，掌握全文意思，并集中对长难句进行分析；第三遍跳读，做题，核对答案并分析。这个时期，要注意阅读的质量而非阅读的数量，大概3天一篇即可，主要是为了扩充词汇及夯实语法基础。　　② 阅读后期。当发现文章中的生词数量变少或已经不影响对文章的理解后，可以把主要精力放在做题上了。做题时，要按照实际考试时对阅读文章的时间安排，每篇文章花费15分钟左右，做完之后，核对答案并进行分析，找出自己出错的原因。生词同样要在做题后查阅。这个时期，实际上是在阅读方面进行模拟，主要是为了拓展考生的知识面和培养答题能力，可以根据考生自己的意愿安排阅读的数量，但尽量保持每天一篇的水平。　　3) 作文练习主要体现在三方面：写作词汇、写作思路和实际写作。前两项可以在开始复习时就有意识地积累或训练，而最后一项需要在拥有一定词汇量和语法知识后再开始进行。　　① 写作词汇。可以跟其他词汇记忆同时进行。　　② 写作思路。可以就某个题目，先自己构思，然后对照范文进行对比、学习；同时积累词汇和有用的句型。　　③ 实际写作。可以跟真题训练同时进行，并保持两个星期一篇的速度即可。写作时，尽量运用多种句型；鼓励用多种表达法表达同一个意思，最后选取最好的一个；尽量运用高级词汇，避免用good，nice，bad，clever等普通词汇。写完后，可以让同学、老师帮忙提出修改建议；同时，也要多看范文，多仿写，多借鉴，多学习。　　模拟题，就是从考试前的2、3个月开始，大概一个星期做一套题就行。　　模拟题的作用在于让我们实战演练，因此，最好是在周六的下午两点至五点之间开始做题，并严格遵守时间限制(需要注意的是，要从这3个小时中扣除10分钟，留给填答题卡)。做完后，可以根据参考答案给自己评分，对于做错的题也要认真对待、加以分析。　　提示：模拟题毕竟跟真题有一定差别，因此无需加以研究。　　真题，可以从暑假开始接触近十年的真题(注意：近两年的真题可以留到临考前的两个星期实战演习)。　　考研真题历来被辅导专家推崇，被考研学子所重视，可以说，只要将历年的考研英语真题完全吃透，英语考试几乎就成功了一半。因此对于真题，我们一定要抱着刨根问底地精神，不放过每一个小细节，不仅仅是对题目的答案要研究、分析，同样还要对出题人的思路和方式加以揣摩、探究。真题里的每个单词、词组都要弄懂并完全掌握，每一个长难句都要仔细分析、理解透彻，最好能加以翻译，万不能遗漏任何一处枝节。　　如果能成功克服这些专项练习题、模拟题和真题，那么，我们离考研英语的胜利就近在咫尺了！希望本文能对各位考生有所启发，在题海战术中仍能辨明方向、目标明确、勇往直前！
预测一篇阅读文章吧。呵呵。

Nuclear power plants cannot be built quickly enough and in a safe and secure manner to be a major global solution for climate change, according to a report released yesterday from the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

The report says the nuclear industry, under current policies and financing, won't be able to build enough new reactors to make a difference in climate in the next 20 years.

"Without major changes in government policies and aggressive financial support, nuclear power is actually likely to account for a declining percentage of global electricity generation," the report says.

The International Energy Agency's World Energy Outlook 2008 projects that without policy changes, nuclear power's share of worldwide electricity generation will drop from 15 percent in 2006 to 10 percent in 2030.

But policymakers should be aware of the timeline, costs and risks nuclear power brings as compared to the possible benefits, before expending a tremendous amount of resources on it, the report says.

Bottlenecks in the nuclear supply chain, weak infrastructure in developing countries and tighter credit risk management strategies in the wake of the economic crises will severely limit all countries' capabilities to significantly expand their nuclear fleet, while the current fleet of reactors is likely to be retired by 2030, the report said.

The earliest the first new U.S. reactor could be finished is 2015, but the report notes that it takes about 10 years to put a new plant in service, from licensing to connection to the grid. In two dozen countries that are interested in obtaining civil nuclear energy but have not previously built a reactor, it will take even longer, the report says.

"The exigencies of energy security and climate change do not warrant racing ahead before institutional frameworks can ensure that any expansion makes sense, not just for energy needs, but for world security," the report says.

The report argues that nuclear energy is not likely to have a significant effect on energy security, either.

It will take at least two decades to convert the world's car fleet from oil to electricity. Transportation is the only sector where nuclear energy can significantly replace oil.

In addition, uranium and nuclear fuel come from only a few countries – Canada, Australia, Russia, the United States and France – making nations without resources or technologies as dependent on foreign sources of energy as before, the report notes. Worse still, it says, the need for fuel may drive more nations to develop their own uranium enrichment facilities, raising the risk of the proliferation of nuclear weapons.

若水168

thank you very much! after reading your article , i gain a lot.

麦穗心